题目是：Some people think traffic and housing problems in large cities can be solved by moving companies and factories and their employees to the countryside. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement.
To tackle the problems of traffic congestion and the shortage of housing, it is suggested that large companies and factories in major cities should be relocated in the rural area. I think this policy can be effective to some extent, but it is difficult to implement, with possible objections and negative outcomes.
There is no doubt that the dense population and limited land resources are responsible for housing shortage in major cities, while the rural area is sparsely populated with sufficient land supply. If some companies, factories and their employees moved out of town, there would be more vacant buildings to meet the demand of city dwellers. Besides, with fewer people travelling to and from work inside the city, traffic is expected to be reduced and pressure on the public transportation system eased.
However, the strategy of business relocation seems to be infeasible, considering the negative outcomes that may ensue. It may impact the sales of some companies whose customers mainly come from the urban area.
Also, the employees may reject to move to the countryside, as they can no longer enjoy the high quality educational resources, medical services and entertainment facilities in the city. The rural infrastructure is relatively backward and life is less convenient. People need to travel between the countryside and the city frequently, leading to new traffic problems, especially on the weekend.
Overall, moving some companies to the rural area can reduce the population and traffic in the city and more houses can be vacated. However, this policy is difficult to put into practice, as some companies and their employees may be unwilling to move.
原题是：Some parents think that they can teach their children at home rather than sending to the school. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
本题属于教育类话题的范畴 。讨论家长可以在家教育孩子而不是送他们去学校，这件事情的好处和坏处 。考生在思考论点时，可以从教育的本质即传输知识和技能这两方面展开，具体论述此举的坏处，以及家庭式教育的灵活性 。一般来说，本文的缺点倾向更好展开;毕竟现实生活中，学校教育是主流方式 。因此，考生在阐述论点时也可以扬长避短 。
paragraph 1 :结合时代背景引入话题且表明自己的观点 。
paragraph 2: 论述在家接受教育的缺点 。(1. 学习知识的不全面 2. 家长教学方法的缺失)
paragraph 3: 论述在家接受教育的缺点 。(1. 缺乏与同龄人的交往)
paragraph 4: 论述在家接受教育的好处 。(1.灵活性和便捷性更强)
Paragraph 5: 总结上文论点，强调自己的观点 。
In contemporary society, due to the easier access to learning and teaching resources, as well as the higher level of education possessed by parents, some of them contend that their children can be better educated at home than at school. From my perspective, such practice exerts more negative impacts on children’s development both in academic attainment and social skills.
The most distinct demerit is that children who receive education at home may fail to have the comprehensive coverage of knowledge. It is ubiquitous that not all parents are generalists although parts of them are granted with Bachelor or even Master Degree. In contrast, teachers at school specialize in different domains; for example, arts teachers gain expertise at literature, history and language while science teachers at physics, chemistry and mathematics. Apparently, learners can be imparted with professional theories or guidance via attending board curricula. What’s worse, it is conceivable that some parents lack teaching strategies and methodology. Unlike them, through years of teaching practice and training, teachers are equipped with the ability to explain complicated equations, illustrate the theme of poetry and the aesthetic value of art works in a simple and understandable way. In this scenario, students’ learning efficiency can be boosted dramatically.